AI Use Case Scoring Framework
A practical framework for prioritizing AI opportunities based on frequency, effort, importance, and data availability. Identify high-ROI use cases for your organization.
Overview
Not all AI opportunities are created equal. This framework helps you systematically evaluate and prioritize AI use cases based on four key factors that predict success and ROI.
The core insight: AI works best when applied to workflows that are frequent, time-consuming, important, and supported by quality data. The more of these factors present, the higher the potential return.
The Four Scoring Factors
1. Frequency
Question: How often does this task or workflow occur?
| Score | Frequency | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Daily | Email responses, meeting notes |
| 2 | Weekly | Status reports, team updates |
| 1 | Monthly | Client reviews, invoicing |
| 0 | Quarterly or less | Strategic planning, annual reviews |
Why it matters: High-frequency tasks offer more opportunities to realize time savings. A 10-minute savings on a daily task equals ~40 hours annually.
2. Effort
Question: How much time and cognitive load does this task consume?
| Score | Effort Level | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | High | Multiple hours, deep focus required |
| 2 | Medium | 30-60 minutes, moderate concentration |
| 1 | Low | Under 30 minutes, routine |
| 0 | Minimal | A few minutes, little thought |
Why it matters: High-effort tasks create the most friction and often get delayed or done poorly due to time pressure.
3. Importance
Question: How much does output quality matter? Would a second opinion help?
| Score | Importance | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Critical | Client-facing, revenue-impacting, regulatory |
| 2 | High | Internal stakeholder visibility, strategic |
| 1 | Moderate | Operational necessity, limited visibility |
| 0 | Low | Nice-to-have, minimal consequence if imperfect |
Why it matters: AI excels at providing "second opinions" and catching errors. High-importance tasks benefit most from this capability.
4. Data Availability
Question: Do you have quality reference materials to guide the AI?
| Score | Data Quality | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Excellent | Templates, style guides, past examples, structured data |
| 2 | Good | Some documentation, informal standards |
| 1 | Limited | Tribal knowledge, inconsistent formats |
| 0 | Poor | No documentation, highly variable outputs |
Why it matters: AI is only as good as the context you provide. "Garbage in, garbage out" still applies.
The Scoring Matrix
How to Use
- List candidate workflows or tasks
- Score each on the four factors (0-3 scale)
- Calculate total score (max 12)
- Prioritize highest-scoring opportunities
Sample Scoring
| Use Case | Frequency | Effort | Importance | Data | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting summaries | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| Client proposals | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 10 |
| Status reports | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| Social media posts | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Annual strategy docs | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
Interpretation Guide
| Total Score | Priority | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| 10-12 | High | Prioritize for immediate implementation |
| 7-9 | Medium | Strong candidate, implement in second wave |
| 4-6 | Low | Consider after high-priority items complete |
| 0-3 | Hold | May not be suitable for AI assistance |
Data Quality Deep Dive
The data availability factor often determines success or failure. Here's how to assess it:
What "Good Data" Looks Like
For Content Generation:
- Brand voice guidelines
- Past examples of successful outputs
- Style guides and templates
- Audience personas
For Analysis Tasks:
- Structured data in consistent formats
- Historical data for comparison
- Clear definitions of key metrics
- Documentation of business rules
For Process Automation:
- Documented workflows
- Clear decision criteria
- Exception handling rules
- Integration points identified
Improving Data Quality
If a high-potential use case scores low on data:
- Document existing knowledge - Interview experts, capture tribal knowledge
- Create templates - Standardize formats for common outputs
- Gather examples - Collect "gold standard" samples
- Define criteria - Establish clear quality benchmarks
Building the Business Case
Once you've identified high-scoring opportunities, build a business case:
Time Savings Calculation
Annual Hours Saved =
(Current Time per Task) × (Frequency per Year) × (Efficiency Gain %)
Example:
- Current time: 30 minutes per meeting summary
- Frequency: 10 meetings per week × 50 weeks = 500/year
- Efficiency gain: 70%
500 × 0.5 hours × 70% = 175 hours saved annually
Cost Calculation
Annual Value = Hours Saved × Blended Hourly Rate
Example:
- 175 hours × $150/hour = $26,250 annual value
Quality Factors
Beyond time savings, consider:
- Error reduction - Fewer mistakes requiring rework
- Consistency - More uniform outputs across team
- Speed to market - Faster turnaround on deliverables
- Employee satisfaction - Less tedious work
Common Use Case Categories
Content & Communication
- Meeting notes and summaries
- Email drafting and responses
- Proposal and pitch creation
- Social media content
- Internal communications
Analysis & Research
- Competitive analysis
- Market research synthesis
- Data analysis and visualization
- Report generation
Operations & Workflow
- Status reporting
- Time tracking and invoicing
- Project documentation
- Process automation
Customer-Facing
- Customer support responses
- Personalized outreach
- Onboarding materials
- FAQ and help content
Implementation Tips
Start with Quick Wins
Choose first implementations that:
- Score 8+ on the framework
- Have clear success metrics
- Involve enthusiastic stakeholders
- Can be demonstrated to others
Build Incrementally
- Pilot with one team or workflow
- Measure actual time savings and quality
- Refine based on feedback
- Scale to additional teams/workflows
Document Everything
Create playbooks that include:
- Prompt templates that work
- Common pitfalls and solutions
- Quality checklist for outputs
- Escalation paths for edge cases
Key Takeaways
- Score systematically - Don't rely on gut feel alone
- Data quality is critical - Invest in context materials
- Frequency drives ROI - Daily tasks compound savings
- Start high, learn fast - Begin with best candidates
Related Resources
Get Help
Need assistance scoring and prioritizing AI opportunities for your organization? Schedule a consultation with our team.